[Kaimee]: 5.Short stories.The Next Amendment | Rating: 0.00 |
2006-02-02 Kuzco: Heh, Rafe got screwed. This is a good story, I like it. As to your request for the dialogues, far from me to even pretend to possess anymore knowledge than you do but lemme try:
“But we have our freedom! We had that freedom to choose how we lived our lives, and we chose this way! Who are you to decide how we should have been, how can you be so incredibly egotistical as to think that your civilisation is better than ours, merely because ours is different?!”
“We had that freedom” ‘the’ instead of ‘that’?
“how can you be so incredibly egotistical” I don’t see how you can call the alien egotistical, if I understand the word correctly (which I probably don’t). If it comes from egoism than I stand by my comment, if it comes from ego like in “egomaniac” than I’m wrong and good choice; My reason is, I think as terrified as he was, Rafe could surely see egoism was something the alien didn’t portrait. Or at least it didn’t seem to me.
“his whining avoided by his travelling companions.” Avoided? This confused me at first. “Ignore” or a more straightforwar
Well, can’t find anything else. I like the basic concept and how you deal with it. “black magic indeed” hehehehe, a good idea indeed. :D
2006-02-02 Kaimee: None of those are anything I want to change, those words are used very purposely ;)
Yes, that freedom. Specifically that freedom. You can't have everything you want in life but most of us do have the freedom to choose how we live it. That freedom, this way. The words there are chosen carefully ;)
The entire alien mission is egotisical. They all believe beyond a shadow of a doubt that they are right, they know best, they should get to decide for the humans because they are "obviously" better. It is an arrogant assertation, from a mind trained to be egotistical in himself (itself?) and in his entire race.
And if you were going on a trip with someone who whined constantly, would you ignore them and endure it, or avoid being near them? Myself, I'd avoid it, not ignore it. And if I had to be near it I'd damn sure do better than ignore it, I'd hit them ;)
2006-02-02 Kaimee: Thankyou for your indepth comments by the way, I really appreciate getting the feedback, I'll return the favour sometime! ^^
2006-02-02 Kuzco: hahha, didn't get one right. ;)
Gonna argue one thing though, I understood the aliens were arrogant; but like they think themselves superior and, instead of just wanting to erradicate us (like a normal superior race tired of the annoying inferior one), they want to change us to what "THEY THINK" its a better way of life. I thought that kinda qualified as wanting to "help us". See what I mean?
And no problem Kaimee, my pleasure I assure you. :)
2006-02-02 Kaimee: Ah, except that they're so egotistical that they can't see that it isn't a case of better or worse ways of life, they're just different. Like, imagine if someone told you they were going to somehow turn every monkey on earth into an ape, because they evolved a 'worse' way. Ridiculous right? They're another species now, just in the same family. You'd think that person was either utterly cracked or incredibly arrogant, believing they have the right and the knowledge to play 'God', never giving those poor monkeys a choice and never considering that the monkeys might be meant to be that way, and have the right to remain themselves.
Now, I'm not actually sure I 'see what you mean' ;) What's your question? That they aren't egotistical because they're helping? No, the egotism lies in their belief that they're right, and their way is right, and never once considering the rights, beliefs and feelings of the humans. It isn't a personal egotism of that particular alien's, it's a species failing, a trait taught to them from the earliest of ages. They're trying to commit something like mass genocide for 'good', they believe that they're fullfilling the correct way of evolution.
Kinda like the Nazis, who were damn arrogant in their beliefs ;) Do you see where I'm going...? :/
2006-02-02 Kuzco: No need to, I see where you're at ;). I get it now, thanks. I apologise for my "kind of" stubborness.
You are right, its my concept of "egotistical" that are wrong, or rather, WERE wrong. :)
2006-02-03 Kaimee: Not wrong, maybe just not broad enough... :P